Trump has ordered a review of crypto firms’ access to payment rails, putting banking access, compliance standards and industry growth back in focus.
President Donald Trump has ordered a federal review of how crypto firms access payment rails, putting the spotlight on banking relationships that underpin deposits, withdrawals and settlement operations across the digital asset industry.
The directive stems from a broader executive order signed in January 2025 titled “Strengthening American Leadership in Digital Financial Technology,” which called on federal agencies to evaluate how existing regulations affect crypto businesses’ ability to operate within the traditional financial system.
Payment rails are the banking and transfer infrastructure that companies use to move funds. For crypto exchanges, custodians and stablecoin issuers, access to these systems determines whether customers can deposit fiat currency, withdraw proceeds or settle trades in dollars.
Why banking access is a make-or-break issue for crypto firms
Crypto businesses depend on partner banks and payment processors to bridge fiat and digital asset flows. Without reliable banking relationships, even well-capitalized firms face disruptions to treasury operations, customer onboarding and day-to-day liquidity management.
The issue is not limited to large exchanges. Smaller crypto startups often struggle to open or maintain business bank accounts at all, a problem the industry has long described as “debanking.” Loss of payment rail access can effectively shut a company out of the regulated financial system.
This concern has surfaced repeatedly in recent policy debates. The President’s Working Group on Digital Asset Markets released recommendations addressing how federal policy should support, rather than restrict, lawful digital asset businesses’ access to banking services.
Regulatory uncertainty around banking access has also raised questions about the legal frameworks governing crypto-adjacent financial activities, a theme that came up when Elizabeth Warren accused the OCC of issuing illegal crypto trust charters.
WHAT TO KNOW
- Payment rails are the banking infrastructure crypto firms need to process fiat deposits, withdrawals and settlements. Losing access can cripple operations.
- The federal review could reshape how banks assess risk when serving crypto clients, potentially opening or narrowing access depending on its conclusions.
What the review could change for banks and crypto markets
A federal review of payment rail access could influence how banking regulators issue guidance to institutions that serve crypto clients. Banks currently navigate an unclear patchwork of expectations from the OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve when deciding whether to onboard digital asset companies.
If the review leads to clearer compliance standards, banks may be more willing to serve exchanges, OTC desks and stablecoin issuers. Conversely, tighter requirements could push smaller firms further from traditional banking channels. The Foley & Lardner analysis of the Working Group’s recommendations noted that clearer rules could reduce compliance costs for banks willing to engage with the sector.
For the broader crypto market, improved banking clarity is generally viewed as a positive signal. Firms with stable payment rail access can offer better liquidity and faster settlement, which in turn supports trading volume and institutional participation. The discussion around banking access connects to wider debates about which digital assets may benefit most from regulatory tailwinds, a question explored in analysis of whether XRP or Bitcoin could deliver higher returns in 2026.
Security and infrastructure resilience also factor into how regulators evaluate crypto firms’ fitness for banking access. Projects investing in long-term technical robustness, such as Ripple’s quantum security partnership for XRPL, may strengthen their case for sustained access to traditional financial infrastructure.
The final impact of the review remains uncertain. Its scope, timeline and ultimate recommendations have not been publicly detailed, and any policy shifts will depend on interagency coordination between banking regulators and the White House.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
